Albert Eschenmoser’s comments

The wording of Question 4 (On the origin of catalytic cycles) is unfortunate, since chemistry and biology are full of “catalytic cycles” which have nothing to do with the origin of life. The author of the question means (as he writes in the text) “the origin of enzyme-like catalysis”. An alternative title for question Nr. 4 would be “On the origin of catalytic control” or “On the origin of catalytic control in the self-organization of matter”

Question 13: The opinion that the anthropic principle is nothing more than a tautology refers only to the “weak version” of the principle, but not the “strong version” that refers to the idea of a “cosmic imperative”, which is elaborated in the question. If the sentence containeing the term “tautology” is going to be kept , it must be made clear that it refers to the weak version of the principle.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s




%d bloggers like this: